Choose New York Law For International Commercial Transactions

Screen Shot 2014-12-01 at 9.44.59 AM

The New York State Bar Association and NYIAC publish a brochure on New York Law, presenting a clear and comprehensive guide for the global business community.

The project was led by the Dispute Resolution Section’s IDR Committee, co-chaired by John Fellas and Richard Mattiaccio, with significant contributions from several NYIAC board and individual members.

Screen Shot 2014-11-11 at 10.08.02 AM

Download the brochure here


New York Contract Law:
A Guide For Non-New York Attorneys

Written by Glen Banks, Esq., a recognized authority on contract law with more than 35 years’ experience, this book is presented in an easy-to-read question-and-answer format to allow easy access to a wide array of topics. For more information, visit this link.


 

New-York-Times-Logo

NYIAC featured in The New York Times

In a Dealbook article, reporter Elizabeth Olson writes:

“…New York has long been a major site for global arbitration proceedings because its contract law is predictable and does not allow for appeals on specious grounds.

Proprietary research for the New York State Bar association projected that an increase of 10 to 20 percent in such proceedings in the city could add as much as $400 million annually to law firm coffers.

[…]  New York is also burnishing its arbitration credentials. Last year, the New York International Arbitration Center opened in Manhattan, as a space where arbitrators can hold hearings to examine the facts and settle cross-border grievances. Some 37 law firms funded the site.

The center, which celebrated its first anniversary in June, has hosted some 20 hearings so far. Most involved commercial arbitrations between two private parties involving issues such as oil and gas, construction and intellectual property, and one dispute arose from a bilateral investment treaty where investors could invoke arbitration in a dispute with governments and governmental entities.

The opening of an International Chamber of Commerce office in Manhattan this year is also likely to help funnel more cases to New York. Thus far, the cases filed increasingly involve parties from North America, said Alexandra Dosman, the center’s executive director, adding that this “reflects the importance of the American market, and that it’s growing.””

Read the article here.


Connect with NYIAC!

FacebookButtonLinkedin-buttonTwitterButton

Book Your Next Arbitration Hearing At NYIAC

Contact us to reserve space for your upcoming arbitraton. NYIAC’s world-class hearing rooms and breakout rooms accommodate arbitrations of any size and duration.

19C5474

We have cutting edge technological capabilities, including high-tech video conferencing and built-in facilities for simultaneous interpretation.

19C5478

Beautiful, comfortable amenities and a location in the heart of Manhattan make NYIAC an ideal arbitration destination.

19C5649

Book your hearing today!

Legal Developments and Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Reverses BG Group v. Argentina

On March 5, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit’s controversial 2012 decision in BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina. The Court ruled that an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal constituted under a bilateral investment treaty is entitled to the same broad deference afforded awards rendered by commercial arbitration tribunals.

Read the full decison (PDF)

Muddy Waters in the Land of Section 1782

In the January 31, 2014 edition of the New York Law Journal, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky mark the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s lone Section 1782 decision by discussing the significant uncertainty that remains concerning an issue spawned by that decision.

Read the full article (PDF)

New York Court of Appeals Rejects Attempt to Bind Non-Signatory

On October 17, 2013, the New York Court of Appeals refused to apply direct benefits estoppel to bind a non-signatory to arbitrate. “The mere existence of an agreement with attendant circumstances that prove advantageous to the non-signatory would not constitute the type of direct benefits justifying compelling arbitration by a non-party.” Matter of Belzberg v Verus Invs. Holdings […]

Read the full decision (PDF)

Recent U.S. Court Decisions Confirm Arbitrator Discretion to Limit Discovery

Three recent decisions by the U.S. Courts of Appeals in New Orleans, Boston and New York reaffirm the longstanding position that arbitrators in U.S.-based arbitrations have discretion to determine the proper scope of discovery and are not bound to follow U.S. litigation discovery practices.  Gregory A. Litt and Colm P. McInerney examine these cases.

Read the full article (PDF)