
Should parties and institutions rely on AI to select arbitrators? Can algorithms promote neutrality, diversity, and efficiency – or do they risk entrenching bias and eroding trust?
Structured as a mock arbitration hearing, this dynamic session hosted by JAMS and Jus Mundi on Thursday, February 11th features:
Counsel advocating for AI-assisted arbitrator selection
Counsel opposing the proposition
A three-member tribunal that will examine both positions and deliver a non-binding opinion
Audience members won’t just observe, but participate, challenge assumptions, and help shape the debate in real time.
This hearing-style format will probe what is gained (and what may be lost) when we let algorithms shape arbitration’s most human decisions.